Disconnected exports
Flag targeting, tenant IDs, ARR, support notes, and contractual promises live in different systems.
Your flag platform knows which flags exist. It does not know which customers depend on them or what revenue breaks if you remove one. Varistra is being built as the record that answers that, across flags and the workflows, templates, integrations, permissions, and contractual exceptions no flag platform holds. It is not generally available yet.
A flag survives its release for a commercial reason, not a technical one. Nobody can prove which accounts still evaluate it, what recurring revenue is exposed if it is removed, or who is accountable for the answer. Lifecycle tooling finds the flag. It cannot make that call.
Flag targeting, tenant IDs, ARR, support notes, and contractual promises live in different systems.
Every flag connects to source rows, the accounts that evaluate it, the ARR behind them, and a review state.
Remove, keep, package, reprice, or migrate, with an owner, a date, and the rationale.
Varistra keeps source facts, calculation assumptions, financial context, and human decisions distinct, then connects them in a reviewable record.
Load a flag or configuration export and an account revenue export. Nothing changes in LaunchDarkly, Unleash, Flagsmith, Statsig, or your own config service.
Expose rejected rows, missing joins, currency boundaries, and source assumptions before anyone trusts a total.
Normalize flags together with the workflows, templates, integrations, permissions, and contractual exceptions no flag platform holds.
Show every account evaluating each flag, the value it receives, how common it is, and the recurring revenue protected by it.
Attach usage, support, and maintenance evidence while keeping observed facts separate from proxies.
Record whether to remove, preserve, migrate, bundle, reprice, or retire, with an owner and a written rationale.
Compare immutable snapshots and preserve the evidence behind every later correction or decision.
Removing a flag is safe only when product, engineering, finance, and customer teams are reading the same account and revenue evidence.
Compare how many accounts evaluate each flag, the ARR behind them, data coverage, burden signals, and decision state, without hiding missing evidence.
Rejected rows, joins, currencies, and calculation assumptions stay visible beside the result.
Review customer dependence, revenue exposure, product burden, and commercial timing together.
Usage, support, maintenance, and revenue signals remain labeled so false precision cannot pass as evidence.
A later import, mapping, or decision creates a new snapshot or event instead of rewriting the original.
Each solution page explains the exact use case, evidence model, product boundary, evaluation criteria, and next purchasing step.
Govern flag lifecycle by customer and revenue exposure, without replacing the platform that delivers flags.
Evaluate fit 02Published prices, free tiers, and the seven different billing units eight vendors actually use.
Evaluate fit 03Service connections and client-side MAU, what moves each meter, and worked estimates from the published rates.
Evaluate fit 04Start a customer-aware stale flag audit with owners, targeting evidence, and treatment states.
Evaluate fit 05Compare runtime feature management with the governance layer that sits above it.
Evaluate fit 06Workflows, templates, integrations, permissions, and contractual exceptions no flag platform holds.
Evaluate fitThe audit template below is free and needs no software from us. Export your flags with their tenant targeting and your accounts with ARR or MRR, and work through the field set. If the exercise is worth automating, tell us.
Use the flag audit templateStable customer ID, ARR or MRR, currency, segment, plan, and status.
Customer ID, flag key, value, type, and source reference. Other configuration types load the same way.
Treatment, owner, timing, rationale, evidence, and revenue handling. Then tell us where it hurt.
Flag governance answers the commercial question a flag platform cannot: which customers evaluate this flag, how much recurring revenue depends on it, who approved keeping it, and when that decision is reviewed again. It is the layer above lifecycle tooling, not a replacement for it.
Flag debt is the set of flags that have outlived their release and cannot be removed, usually because nobody can prove which customers still depend on them. It is a record-keeping problem rather than a code problem, which is why a newer flag platform does not reduce it.
Product, engineering, product operations, and finance leaders, usually when a flag cleanup, packaging change, renewal, migration, or platform consolidation has stalled because nobody can produce a defensible customer-by-flag dependency map.
No. Feature management platforms deliver runtime behavior, and CMDBs inventory infrastructure or IT assets. Varistra ingests their evidence and adds the customer, revenue, operating-burden, and decision layer.
Not yet. Varistra is in development and there is no self-serve signup. The feature flag audit template on this site is free and usable now with nothing but a spreadsheet. If you want to be part of the early work, use the contact form.
It links each accepted account to the flags and variants assigned to it, preserves currency boundaries, reports rejected or unmatched rows, and never sums overlapping account revenue across several flags. It does not claim to be a complete customer profitability calculation.
No. Varistra makes the evidence and the assumptions reviewable. Authorized people publish the treatment, rationale, owner, timing, and revenue handling.
Varistra is in development and not generally available. If flag debt is already blocking a decision on your side, tell us what the blocker is. We would rather build against a real case than a guess.